Make and Zapier compared (and a better and easier alternative)

Make and Zapier compared (and a better and easier alternative)

Make and Zapier are two workflow automation tools designed to integrate your favorite apps and automate repetitive tasks. But how do they stack up against each other?

Decorative image

Need help deciding between Make and Zapier?

If you’re looking for a workflow automation tool to integrate your favorite apps and automate repetitive tasks, two names often come up: Make (formerly Integromat) and Zapier. Both platforms have powerful features to streamline complex workflows. But how do they compare, and which tool is best for your specific needs?
In this article, we’ll dive deep into Make vs. Zapier, examining their interfaces, pricing structures, and key features to help you make the best decision for your business. As a bonus, we’ll also review an emerging contender in the market that’s redefining what's possible in this category. (Hint: it’s us, Relay.app!)
But before we get into the specifics of each of these platforms, we'll summarize our recommendations and how we made them.

TL;DR

If you’re looking for a quick take, here's our tl;dr of how Make and Zapier compare:

  • Make: Best for technical users who require complex, multi-step workflows and those who prioritize cost-effectiveness and customization in their automation processes.

  • Zapier: Best for individuals and teams seeking ease of use with a vast integration library, preferring a straightforward approach to automation without needing in-depth technical knowledge.
    Both tools make your life easier by connecting your favorite apps and services, but they each have their unique offerings. It's all about matching your needs to their strengths.

A bit of background on workflow automation

The purpose of a workflow automation tool is to simplify how disparate applications interact and integrate. They typically come with a user-friendly interface, drag-and-drop editors, and can handle integration tasks ranging from simple data syncs like updating a CRM to complex, multi-step workflows across a variety of systems.
Unlike some other workflow automation tools, Zapier and Make are specifically geared towards non-developers, empowering people with little to no technical expertise to automate business processes. This is why these two tools are often in the same consideration set, but each platform brings a unique set of features to its automation approach.

Comparing Make and Zapier

Make

G2:

⭐️

4.6

Product Hunt:

⭐️

4.8

External image

Make is a visual-first no-code automation platform that lets you design complex workflows on a canvas by connecting modules from 3,000+ apps. It supports advanced logic like branching, filtering, iteration, and error handling, making it popular with power users who need more control than simpler tools offer. Make has recently expanded into AI with AI Agents (currently in beta), an AI Toolkit, MCP server support, and 400+ AI app integrations including OpenAI, DeepSeek, and Perplexity. The platform uses a credit-based billing model where each module action counts as one credit. Make is well-suited for technical users and teams that need to build sophisticated, multi-step automations with granular control over every step.

✅ Pros

  • Powerful visual scenario builder: The canvas-based editor lets you see exactly how data flows through your automation — great for debugging and complex logic.

  • Advanced workflow logic: Supports branching, filtering, iteration, and error handling that most simpler tools can't match.

  • Strong integration library: Connects with 3,000+ apps, with deep action support across most of them.

  • Generous pricing relative to complexity: Make offers more operations per dollar than Zapier, making it attractive for higher-volume automations.

❌ Cons

  • Steep learning curve: Make's power comes at a cost — non-technical users typically need 10–20 hours before feeling comfortable, and concepts like routers, iterators, and aggregators take real investment to learn.

  • Credit billing can get expensive: Make switched from operations to a credit-based model, and AI modules in particular can burn through credits quickly if you're not careful about how workflows are architected.

  • AI capabilities still maturing: The next-gen agents are in open beta and pricing may still evolve.

💰 Pricing

  • Free: $0/month – 1,000 credits/month

  • Core: $9/month – 10,000 credits/month

  • Pro: $16/month – 10,000 credits/month plus priority execution and advanced features

  • Teams: $29/month – 10,000 credits/month plus team collaboration

  • Enterprise: Custom pricing

External image

Takeaway

Make is a strong choice for power users and technical teams who need granular control over complex, multi-step automations. Its visual canvas and advanced logic features are best-in-class for those willing to invest the time to learn them. However, the steep learning curve and credit-based billing complexity mean it's not ideal for non-technical users or teams that want to get started quickly. If you want similar visual automation power but with a much easier setup experience — especially for building AI agents — tools like Relay.app offer a more approachable alternative.

Zapier

G2:

⭐️

4.5

Product Hunt:

⭐️

4.8

External image

Zapier is a very well-known automation tool (the "OG" of no-code workflows) that has significantly expanded its AI capabilities. Traditionally, Zapier connects your apps: "When X happens in app A, do Y in app B." Now, Zapier offers dedicated AI Agents, AI Chatbots, Canvas (for visually designing automation systems), and MCP (Model Context Protocol) for connecting AI tools to its ecosystem. Zapier isn't an AI-specialized platform like some others here, but its strength is the 8,000+ app integrations it supports. This means you can trigger AI agents based on almost any event (new email, form submission, CRM update—you name it) and then have the AI perform an action or generate content as part of the workflow. Use cases: e.g., automatically summarize every new support ticket with GPT and post it to Slack, or generate a draft email reply when a lead comes in, etc., all using Zapier's workflow editor.

✅ Pros

  • Massive integration ecosystem: Zapier connects with over 8,000 apps, so your AI agent can interact with nearly any tool your business uses — unmatched in the industry.

  • Mature product and platform: Zapier has a reputation for dependable execution of workflows and extensive documentation + community support.

  • Extensive template library: Thousands of pre-built Zap templates (including many with AI) to get you started quickly.

  • Expanding AI toolkit: Now offers dedicated AI Agents, Chatbots, Canvas, and MCP support alongside its core automation platform.

❌ Cons

  • AI agent capabilities not as advanced: Zapier's AI features are still maturing compared to specialized AI agent builders.

  • More difficult to evolve an older product: Zapier's legacy as an if-this-then-that tool can make it harder to match the ease of use that cutting-edge AI demands.

  • Fragmented pricing for AI features: AI Agents and Chatbots are separate paid add-ons on top of the base platform, which adds complexity and cost.

💰 Pricing

  • Free Tier: Yes – 100 tasks/month with two-step Zaps, plus Tables, Forms, and Zapier MCP included.

  • Professional: Starting from $19.99/month (billed annually) – multi-step Zaps, unlimited premium apps, Tables, Forms, and MCP included.

  • Team: Starting from $69/month (billed annually) – 25 users, shared Zaps, SAML SSO.

  • Enterprise: Custom pricing – unlimited users, advanced admin controls, observability.

  • AI Agents add-on: Free (400 activities/mo) or Pro ($33.33/mo for 1,500 activities).

  • Chatbots add-on: Free (2 chatbots), Pro ($13.33/mo for 5 chatbots), or Advanced ($66.67/mo for 20 chatbots).

External image

Takeaway

If you already use Zapier for automation, it's a natural step to experiment with its AI features. It's best for scenarios where connecting different apps is the priority, and AI just plays one part in the workflow. It's a safe choice if you use niche tools that aren't covered by other platforms in this category.

A deeper dive on key features

Key features of Make

Make offers a comprehensive suite of features that cater to a wide array of automation needs. It excels in handling complex, multi-step workflows, offering unmatched granularity and flexibility. The tool suits users with specific automation visions, providing deep customization through its visual builder, enabling users to craft detailed scenarios, and ensuring routine tasks execute as planned.

Multi-step workflows

Juggling multiple tasks sequentially? No problem. Make supports complex, multi-step workflows that can handle intricate processes involving multiple actions and conditions. This capability allows you to design detailed automations that accurately reflect your nuanced operational needs, ensuring tasks are executed precisely as intended.

Instant webhook execution

Webhooks are a critical component in triggering automations based on events in other applications. Make's instant webhook execution means that as soon as an event occurs, the corresponding automation is triggered without delay, enhancing the responsiveness and timeliness of workflow execution.

Unlimited use of tools

Make does not restrict access to its powerful tools, such as filters, functions, routers (paths), and more, regardless of the plan you're on. This openness ensures you can fully utilize Make's capabilities to customize and refine their automations to meet your exact requirements.

Complex data manipulation

Make excels in offering advanced data manipulation capabilities, including array manipulation, JSON/XML parsing, cycles, transactions, and more. These features empower you to work with data in sophisticated ways, enhancing the power and flexibility of automations.

Depth of integrations

Despite featuring a smaller app library (1,600+), Make provides significantly more API endpoints per app than Zapier. This distinction means that you have access to a wider variety of actions and triggers when setting up their automations, allowing for more granular and specific control over your workflows.
To pick just one example: Zapier offers 26 potential actions with Trello and Make offers 52.

Key features of Zapier

Zapier is most known for its vast library of pre-built integrations, connecting to over 7,000+ apps and automating powerful workflows between them.
Zapier focuses on simplicity and user-friendliness, ideal for beginners or those seeking straightforward solutions. Its interface and extensive 'Zaps' collection simplify automation setup, bypassing the need for detailed technical knowledge. Zapier aims to connect numerous apps effortlessly, catering to users prioritizing speed and ease.

Friendlier user interface

Zapier's interface is designed with simplicity in mind, making it more intuitive for users of varied skill levels. Its straightforward layout allows you to quickly understand how to create automations, known as Zaps. Although some automations require more advanced setup, and it has its UI language to get familiar with, in general most users can get Zaps up and running without a steep learning curve. Its approachability is appealing to those new to automation or those who prefer a more guided experience.

Extensive library of premade workflows

One of Zapier's most user-friendly features is its vast collection of pre-made Zaps. These templates provide users with ready-made automations that can be easily customized to fit their needs, significantly reducing the time and effort required to set up new workflows. This library not only accelerates the automation setup process but also serves as a learning tool, helping you understand how different apps can be connected and automated.

Simplified automation creation process

Creating Zaps in Zapier is simple: Choose a trigger app, select the specific trigger event, pick an action app, and then specify the action to be performed. This linear, step-by-step approach demystifies the automation creation process, making it accessible even to those with little to no technical background (and it's made even easier with the AI copilot).

Internal app-building tools

Zapier has recently come out with a few internal app-building tools to add to its workflow automation offering, including Tables, Interfaces, and Chatbots. Zapier Tables allow you to store and manipulate data directly in Zapier, making it easy to track key information without needing a separate database. Interfaces provide a simple, customizable front-end for teams to interact with workflows and automate processes without diving into the back-end logic. The Chatbot feature allows you to build AI bots to enable a more interactive and conversational approach to task automation. If you’re looking for more than just workflow automation, Zapier has you covered here.

Breadth of integrations

Zapier is renowned for its expansive integration library, boasting connections with over 7,000 apps, making it one of the largest in the automation space. This vast array ensures users can find almost any app they need to integrate, from mainstream applications to niche tools, facilitating a broad range of automation possibilities.

Direct comparison of Make and Zapier

Now that you have a solid understanding of the ins and outs of each of these tools, let’s compare them side-by-side:

  • Ease of use: From the onboarding experience to support resources to its intuitive interface, Zapier holds a significant advantage in terms of ease of use, especially for beginners or those looking for quick automation solutions. This accessibility is a key reason why many users gravitate towards Zapier when first diving into the world of automation.

  • Complexity of workflows: Make thrives with intricate workflows that require detailed control and conditional logic. Zapier, while powerful, is typically better suited for simpler, linear workflows.

  • Visual interface: Both tools have solid no-code interfaces. Make provides a visually rich UI that helps map out complex automations via their Router Tool. On the other hand, Zapier's clean, vertical-step design is user-friendly, but it may not display complex tasks, like branching or looping as clearly.

  • Advanced features: Make allows for more granular control of its workflow builder, like allowing you to set the exact number of times an action should be repeated. Zapier's strength lies much more in its simplicity and ease of use, with less emphasis on highly technical features. It recently added some internal app-building tools, like Tables, Interfaces, and Chatbots, which might be of interest to people looking for more than just a workflow automation solution.

  • Pricing plans: Make is more cost-effective for most use cases. It doesn’t restrict its advanced logic behind higher-tiered plans like Zapier, and for high volume, complex workflows, Make’s pricing is often more advantageous.

  • Integrations: Both platforms boast a wide range of integrations, where Zapier has an edge on breadth (7,000+ apps), but Make has the advantage of integration depth—often supporting far more actions per app than Zapier.
    As you can see, choosing between Zapier or Make really depends on the specific needs of your business and the capacity of your team. But as mentioned earlier, there is a third option, Relay.app, that might be a better solution for your business.

How to choose

Choose Zapier If:

You're a beginner who wants to jump in without a manual. You care about:

  • User experience: You're into a more intuitive, visual interface. Zapier's got friendly 'Zaps' that guide you through setting up your automated tasks with clear step-by-step logic.

  • Range of integrations: You want access to a massive app directory. Zapier boasts a ton of integrations, so chances are, your apps are on the list.

  • Simpler workflows: You're not looking to get super granular. Zapier handles straight-line tasks like a champ - think 'If this, then that' scenarios.

  • Premium pricing: You don't mind paying a bit for convenience and are OK with the set number of Zaps and tasks that come with each tier.

Choose Make If:

You’re more tech-savvy and want granular control of your workflows. You care about:

  • Advanced features: You're ready to set up more complex automations. Make gives you tools like advanced Conditional Logic and Router tool, enabling you to build multi-step, intricate workflows.

  • Detailed control: You love the idea of granular control over your automations. With Make, you get to manage many more components of your workflow steps.

  • Volume pricing: You need a cost-effective solution that grows with you. Make's operations-based pricing model is generally kinder to your wallet as your automation needs expand.

  • Technical expertise: You have the know-how (or the drive to learn) to take advantage of Make’s detailed features and flexibility.

Why not consider Relay.app as an alternative?

When looking at automation platforms like Make and Zapier, another popular tool on the market is Relay.app. Relay.app is a newer player in the space, but it offers an exceptional user experience, deep integrations, and human oversight of AI workflows.

Why people love Relay.app:

  • User experience: The number one reason people choose Relay.app is for its ease of use. It is intentionally designed for people of all skill levels to be able to create and run AI agents and automations. The interface feels simple, modern, straightforward, and enjoyable to use.

  • Natural language interaction: In addition to having a straightforward workflow builder, Relay.app goes beyond to offer an AI chat experience that will build workflows for you. Just tell the AI agent what you need to build, and watch it create. You can talk to the AI agent like you are talking with a coworker: Give it feedback and ask questions.

  • AI experience: Beyond nailing the automation basics, Relay.app has the most advanced and easiest-to-use AI integrations. All of the models you'd want to use (Open AI's GPTs, Claude, Gemini, Llama, and more) are built directly into the product in an easy-to-use set of AI steps. No need to set up other accounts or use API keys. These models are built in using Relay.app's AI credit system.

  • Human-in-the-loop capabilities: Not all automations should be, well, automated. Relay.app makes it easy to bring human judgement into processes where you need it. Add approvals, forms, and decision making points where a teammate's input is critical.

  • Collaborative automation building: Relay.app is built for teams. Everyone can create their own team of agents and share them with each other. Teams can collaborate by sharing agents, workflows, and app connections. Edit workflows together (even simultaneously), add comments, and get work done together.

The bottom line

Now that you understand the ins and outs of Zapier and Make (and Relay.app), it’s time to pick a tool and start automating your workflows!
You can’t go wrong with any of these options, but if you’re ready to experience a more advanced, efficient, and human-centric approach to workflow automation, try Relay.app for free today, and discover how it can transform your processes, enhance teamwork, and lead your automation strategy into the future.

FAQs

Is there a free Zapier?

What is the Microsoft version of Zapier?

Who is Zapier's main competitor?

What's the easiest workflow automation tool for non-technical users?

How does Relay.app compare to Zapier for AI automation?

What is the difference between Make and Zapier?

Are Make and Integromat the same thing?